I hadn't used foul language- I had however humiliated Jason by showing that his vaunted scholarship and ratiocinative power was utterly worthless.
Jason tried to extort money from me, by impersonating a female attorney of a prestigious firm, on the excuse of adjudicating my complaint against the BHL website.
I pointed out to him that he would go to jail if he did not apologize and make restitution before the end of December.
He has not done so. Why? He thinks he is really really smart and I'm fucking Christian and really really dumb..
He has not done so. Why? He thinks he is really really smart and I'm fucking Christian and really really dumb..
Jason sent me this email
23 Dec (4 days ago)  | | |||
| Mr Iyer, In the spirit of Christmas, please accept my deepest apology for my childish, miscreant behavior. I will use the next few days to reflect upon my flaws, and hopefully take the first steps toward building better character. Thank you for your patience and tolerance in this matter. All best wishes Notice, the cunt did not sign his name to the above. I also sent him an Email on Xmas Day, APOLOGIZING FOR ANY DISTRESS I MAY HAVE CAUSED HIM!/ Her. ( He sometimes pretends to be a woman by the name of Debbie Dresner) I stand by that. I put my name to it. It was genuine. I actually took out material from my blog which might reflect badly on this fucking cunt. But, guess what? The fucker wasn't genuine. How do we know? His confession is too short. Liars keep their statements short. This cunt just doesn't want to go to Jail. Still, there are people who make mistakes who are anxious to do something in the way of reparation so as to avoid incarceration. Brennan is far above that. He hasn't apologized for his prejudicial conduct on BHL- indeed,. I'm still banned there which suggests Jason has a good defense in Law against the charges I and others will be bringing against him. Does he have an equally good defense against FEDERAL CHARGES OR EXTORTION, WIRE FRAUD AND RACKETEERING? Time will tell. |
Did you even ask him to apologize on his website? Seems to me you are acting in a most unchristian manner. You asked him to apologize, and he did. Then after the fact you thought of additional things you wanted him to do. Looks like you are in the wrong here.
ReplyDeleteSo, he didn't sign the apology? Wasn't it obvious it came from him? Didn't he send it to you from his own email account?
DeleteSeems to me he apologized, and then you acted like a jerk, so now he's shunning you.
Now, you may say, Brennan and you are equals. You gave him a unilateral pass. Now you go back on it. You are an Indian giver. This is ungentlemanly and unchristian.
DeleteMy response is; Brennan and I did not engage as equals. He claimed, and I initially conceded, his superior auctoritas, though it transpired that this was both fraudulent and involved a criminal conspiracy to extort money which, since the offence was received in England, is bound by English law.
I have in good faith apologized to Brennan for any distress I caused him. I apologize to everyone whom I've offended. I am a sinner who weeps and sighs for release from the bondage of Sin.
However, once Brennan admitted his guilt, apologized to me, and said that he was taking certain steps so as to become a better man, I gained autorictas over him in the shape of a duty to admonish and threaten till he had himself taken the proper steps to put himself out of danger of Sin and Wrongdoing.
This is a subtle point- but I make it because it strikes at the philosophical root of a particular, morally slovenly, praxeology which nevertheless has currency.
I welcome your comments.
You're right that Brennan is a sociopathic piece of shit. But there's little you can do about that. We each have to do the Christian thing, which is to forgive (even those who don't deserve it!) and move on. Remember, Christ forgave all of us, even though none of us deserve it.
ReplyDeleteYou might say that Christ forgives only those who are completely and fully sorry. But--and this is a subtle point lost on most Christians--none of us are capable of being completely and fully sorry without God's grace.
The truth is, when another sinner asks for forgiveness, we sinners can't know whether that sinner is sincere or not. Only God knows. So, what we need to do is grant that forgiveness, in the image of Christ, and trust in the Lord to deal justice and mercy during the day of judgment.
Well said. Not to forgive is to nurse a cancer.
ReplyDeleteIf you can prove BHL did the same thing to anyone else then they can be charged under RICO- the anti-racketeering act.
ReplyDelete